CO2  and  global warming












Meditation
Activities
Where
How much
Why
How
Pictures
MP3  meditations
Practical
   meditations




Health
Vitamin D
Vaccination
Homeopathy
Iodine
GMO
Light
MSG
Chemtrails
Arthritis
Brain
Vegetarianism
Cancer

Spirits
 removal

Etheric
 implants
  removal
































   Top






















   Top





























   Top




























   Top 



  Français  

  Carbon dioxide and climate change


   CO2  is an essential gas: It is the food of plants.  No CO2  =  no life on earth.

   In many greenhouses, farmers add CO2 to promote plant growth.  We can see that from the following image where the plants had the same growth time and the same conditions, except different percentages of CO2.

% CO2 in a greenhouse




  One of my favorite images is the diagram of the concentration of CO2 along the temperature in the history of the earth.  By analyzing the sedimentary rocks scientists reconstruct the climatic conditions of the different geological eras.   It is a well-known and accepted diagram.


CO2 and temperature in geological time


 
   The CO2 is represented in black and the temperature in blue.  We can observe that :

- The current temperature is one of the lowest in the history of the earth and that it corresponds to a pre-glacial era.  Warming up is  welcome not to end up again with 1000m of ice over Montreal like in the last ice age.

- The percentage of CO2 is also very low.  Plants are at the limit of survival.

- There have been very long periods with temperatures 8 to 10 degrees Celsius higher than now.  The land then had lush vegetation with spectacular animal life.   Coal for example is the result of these luxuriant warm periods.

- The two lines representing CO2 and temperature are not parallel, far from that.   If CO2 was the main factor influencing the temperature of the globe, these lines should be parallels.  As they are very different, that means that CO2 is only a small player in the game.


   You understand that I am not a believer in the new religion of global warming.  In the past, as I love heat, I used to joke that i was waiting for Canada to really warm up.  Unfortunately, I do not really see the announced warming.  It is so true globally that we hear less and less about '' global warming '' but more and more about  ''climate change '' or climate ''emergency''.   In fact, weather stations around the world and satellites confirm that after a few warm years around 2000, the global temperature tends to diminish.  This is what scientists warned us about in the 70s.  They were speaking at that time of a pre-glacial era.


   Over the last twenty years, the oceans continued to rise by 1,8 mm a year, as they did in the last century, and polar bears tend to multiply.  In fact, recently, a polar bear specialist in Vancouver lost her job after saying publicly that their population was growing.   Here is a good video about their good health :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6bcCTFnGZ0


       Worse than that!   The planet is getting greener and greener!!!

  
  Since plants have not been told that CO2 is very dangerous
and that they should fast,  they take advantage of the small increase of CO2 to proliferate.      Traitors!         Even NASA's satellites are noticing it: the planet is becoming greener!   AIE Aie Aie.  The warming will be more and more difficult to sell.  It seems that the crops are breaking records.  I wonder why they do not talk about it on TV.  It seems to me that this is good news.


   It's strange, but this whole 'climate emergency' story reminds me of my twenties, almost half a century ago.  At the time, studying in biology and geology in a French University, we were the first ecologists.  We were convinced that the planet would have only a few years left and that all life on earth would collapse soon.   I have an uncomfortable impression of déjà-vu ...

    Is it possible that some influential people or corporations like to scare the naïve population?   Why?   What kind of interest do they have?   Is it true that they always need a war to distract people from real issues?

  

   François Gervais is a French university professor specializing in the atmosphere.  Very knowledgeable and humorous, his lectures on Youtube are a pleasure to watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK3G8wqqp_k

 
  In English, the short videos of Tony Heller, also a scientist, are also part of my favorite. 

https://www.youtube.com/user/TonyHeller1

https://realclimatescience.com/



  Geo-engeenering = climate manipulation

  On the chemtrails page I describe how I have seen again and again the connections between aerosol sprays above our heads and clouds formation, sudden changes in temperature, heavy rains, freezing rain, and tornadoes.  I am not the only one to notice them.  Many people now are aware of them.  After denying their existence for many years, the Canadian government ,for the first time, provided documents to a former British Columbia prime minister acknowledging the phenomenon.  After years of lies,  the truth eventually emerges.   After witnessing blatant lies in the media and the government, it is difficult to believe them any more.   But I like this chemtrail conspiracy because we only have to observe the sky by ourselves to see the truth.



   Does the theory of climate change is the cover-up for climatic manipulations?

   Or are climatic manipulations used to confirm and reinforce the theory of climate change?

   Or are they the two faces of the same coin where the 
two accomplices walk hand in hand?


I do not know.




To be continued...





   Top 


















M
e
n
u




























M
e
n
u































M
e
n
u




























M
e
n
u





























M
e
n
u


































M
e
n
u